✍️
Qwertycoin Whitepaper
  • Cover Page
  • Credits
  • Index
  • Introduction
  • Vision
    • Vision
    • Blockchain Development Roadmap
    • Exchange Listing and Pricing Strategies
  • Consensus
    • [Outdated] CryptoNote Proof of Work
      • CryptoNote block reward scheme calculation
        • An example of CryptoNote block reward scheme manipulation
    • Egalitarian Proof of Work (EPoW)
      • Introduction of EPoW block reward algorithm based on Consistency
        • An example of how QWC prevented CryptoNote block reward manipulation
      • Difficulty Algorithm - CIMA (Confidence Interval Moving Average)
        • Testnet Result
      • Difficulty Algorithm - CLIF (Critical Level Impediment Failsafe)
        • Testnet Result
      • Do you want to make EPoW more egalitarian by switching mining algorithm?
    • Transition from PoW to PoS
    • Egalitarian Proof of Stake (EPoS) - Hybrid PoS/dPoS
      • Sharding
    • Egalitarian Proof of Service (EPoSe) - Hybrid EPoW/EPoS
  • Scalability
    • Genesis Reference Block (GRB)
    • Consolidation
    • Pruning
  • Blockchain Governance
    • FATF Compliance
    • 10% Governance Fee
    • Community Voting
  • DeFi Tranasactions
    • Time Locked Transaction (TLT)
    • Long Term Staking (LTS)
    • On-Chain Trade (OCT)
  • Smart Contracts
    • Multi-Signature
    • NFT(Non Fungible Token)
  • Features
    • LMDB (Lightening Memory Mapped Database)
  • Future Directions
Powered by GitBook
On this page

Was this helpful?

Export as PDF
  1. Consensus
  2. Egalitarian Proof of Work (EPoW)
  3. Introduction of EPoW block reward algorithm based on Consistency

An example of how QWC prevented CryptoNote block reward manipulation

Last Updated 2020-07-23

PreviousIntroduction of EPoW block reward algorithm based on ConsistencyNextDifficulty Algorithm - CIMA (Confidence Interval Moving Average)

Last updated 4 years ago

Was this helpful?

[Figure 6. Block Reward Adjustment using consistency]

Area A: An area where miners can take more coins per second if find a block within 120 seconds. Area B: An area that is bound by CN block reward scheme after 120 seconds of mining. No matter how long it takes for miners to find a block, the block reward stays at the level before 120 seconds.

Area C1 - C6: An area where block rewards will increase after 120 seconds of mining. The current block reward algorithm is set to adjust the consistency factor using a power of 1/4.

Y-axis represents consistency. If consistency is equal to 1, that means the reward is equal to design block reward, which is decreasing every block.

[Table 2. An example of mining rewards based on EPoW block reward algorithm between block 500,000 and 500,019]

In [Table 2], EPoW Reward column shows an adjusted base reward for each block from the introduction of ‘consistency’

The maximum value from [Table 2] under EPoW reward per second is consistently at 1,132 QWC when mined less than or equal to 120 seconds and the lower bound is at 370 QWC.

The maximum value from [Table 1] under actual reward per second is at 10,449 QWC and the range of reward per second when a block is mined less than or equal to 120 seconds, is between 1,132 QWC and 10,449 QWC, while the lower bound is at 295 QWC.

The CN block reward scheme is now fully protected with the application of consistency because it controls the coin emission consistent over time even after providing additional rewards for extra efforts by miners if solve time for a block increases beyond the full grant zone of 120 seconds.

To demonstrate the changes, the same data set was used from

the example of manipulation under CN block reward scheme.
Mining Reward Graph after EPoW (Area A to C6), Consistency value of 1 stands for a full block reward.
Click the table to enlarge the view.